Hi Corey,

you said: "As Ken has mentioned many times, “one-person-one-vote” in a society that have predominantly traditional values means the banning of evolution in Kansas."

and then asked: "What, from your perspective, is the solution to this?"

I have no professionally informed political solution to that. The only solution I could imagine to work is to LET the masses transform themselves into higher stages of integral awareness. But as integral development is an ardous process and almost impossible to accomplish without someone guiding you and ensuring you haven't dropped your commitment to transformation, a bunch of pundits going public via Internet giving an orientation to the masses of those willing to transform and further some intelligent software-solution getting your commitment straight is required.

And this gets me to what II can do and I always thought was the most important thing for it to do: "produce", say, a dozen pundits like Ken, people offering the masses personal orientation and get their material online for free plus create some software that helps people comminting themselves to the practice they have chosen (by say, restricting the material not to those who can pay most but to those who do the practice on most regular basis and produce community content).

Becoming a pundit on your own is almost impossible, in most cases you end up in dilletantism. But imagine a place where several people having devoted their lives to punditry could do this thing together (virtually or somatically) in something like an integral monastery where you spend your day working, preparing presentations for the other pundits and meditating, working for the preservation of what the traditions have to say on the human potential.

Am I the only crazy person having expected II to create such a place? A place where Ken ain't the only pundit but where HE MAKES SURE he isn't the only one?

me greets you