What are the Four Quadrants?
According to Integral Theory, there are at least 4 primary dimensions or perspectives through which we can experience the world: subjective, intersubjective, objective, and interobjective.
These 4 perspectives, represented graphically, are the upper-left, lower-left, upper-right, and lower-right quadrants.


In the subjective—or upper-left—quadrant, we find the world of our individual, interior experiences: our thoughts, emotions, memories, states of mind, perceptions, and immediate sensations—in other words, our “I” space.
In the intersubjective—or lower-left—quadrant, we find the world of our colletive, interior experiences: our shared values, meanings, language, relationships, and cultural background—in other words, our "we" space.
In the objective—or upper-right—quadrant, we find the world of individual, exterior things: our material body (including brain) and anything that you can see or touch (or observe scientifically) in time and space—in other words, our “it” space.
In the interobjective—or lower-right—quadrant, we find the world of collective, exterior things: systems, networks, technology, government, and the natural environment—in other words, our “its” space.

What’s the point of looking at the world through a 4-quadrant lens?
Simple answer: Anything less is narrow, partial and fragmented! Integral Theory maintains that all 4 quadrants are real—and all are important. So, for example, to the question of what is more real, the brain (with its neural pathways and structures) or the mind (with its thoughts and perceptions), Integral Theory answers: BOTH.
Moreover, we add that the mind and brain are situated in cultural and systemic contexts, which influence both inner experience and brain activity in irreducible ways.
What’s more important in human behavior? The psychology of the mind (upper left), or the cultural conditioning of the individual (lower left)? Integral Theory answers, again: BOTH. What is more critical in social development? The habits, customs, and norms of a culture (lower left), or the products it produces (like gun and steel lower right). Integral Theory answers: BOTH.
All four quadrants are real, all are important, and all are essential for understanding your world.
While some might like to reduce reality to the mind (upper-left quadrant), and others to the brain (upper-right quadrant), and still others to the influence of cultural context (lower-left quadrant), and yet others to the effect of systems (“it’s the economy, stupid!” i.e., lower-right quadrant), Integral Theory holds that ALL 4 QUADRANTS are indispensable. The more we can consciously include the 4 quadrants in our perspective, the more whole, balanced, healthy, comprehensive, and effective our actions will be.
And it all boils down to just four dimensions. It's as easy as I, we, it, and its!
That’s why each issue of Holons presents “your world through an integral lens.” It’s a quick and easy way of taking a comprehensive and fun (!) tour of the 4 quadrants of your world.
Want to learn more? CLICK HERE to download our free PDF, “Introduction to Integral Theory and Practice,” by Ken Wilber.
Also be sure to check out What is Altitude?, which summarizes the Integral approach to developmental studies....





Free PDF?
I was unable to download a free PDF on Wilber's site. I was registered but when I clicked download pdf, it would just take me to a menu of items to subscribe to.
Sorry about that; i provided
Sorry about that; i provided the password-protected link rather than the free link as i was supposed to. Try it again, it should work fine for you now.
inbetweeneyes: the transparant
having lived so many lives by (k)now i accept the 4 Quadrants as a Machinery of the Hearths power to Live On Continuously Conscious by the *Able next to the Heart Pneumatics.
So here another "jective" comes next to the subjective & objectives ... which is the transjective , also know as the "transparant" trans-parent, the elder.
I saw this scene in a mongolian tent which has the stove as a heart next to the center of that tent: which is at the floor: the Table ... which EnAbles all there to attune their Voice
(to be objective degenerated to "money" where the transparanthem serves moon*eyes)
namasteY s'ace
Subjectivity and Exteriority do not equal comprehensivity
Mr. Wilbur's synthetic abilities are quite impressive, but you don't derive a complete picture from an amalgam of bits and pieces of psychology, astrology and philosophy. There is breadth, but not enough depth. This "Integral" stuff is fundamentally slickly-packaged oriental philosophy with an overlay of analysis/synthesis to appeal to the western mind. It is like a meal of candy bars - fun but not nutritious. Why? Because there is no spiritual reality in the picture, only descriptions of its reflection. Beware the clever, glib wordsmiths. They are everywhere, and Wilbur is one of the best.
Can you say more?
Anon -
Can you say more to articulate and substantiate your position? At first reading it seems that you don't understand what integral theory is or why it came to be. You don't offer any specific examples, evidence or facts to back your claims. (And some of your claims, like that of use of astrology, are just wrong.) If you can do so, you might find people here who will engage in deep and fruitful conversation.
Post new comment